New study envisions future possibilities for White’s Ferry

White’s Ferry has been closed since December 2020 in a legal dispute with Rockland Farm, the owner of the land on the Virginia side of the river. (WTOP/Neal Augenstein)
White’s Ferry has been closed since December 2020 in a legal dispute with Rockland Farm, the owner of the land on the Virginia side of the river. (WTOP/Neal Augenstein)
White’s Ferry has been closed since December 2020 in a legal dispute with Rockland Farm, the owner of the land on the Virginia side of the river. (WTOP/Neal Augenstein)
White’s Ferry has been closed since December 2020 in a legal dispute with Rockland Farm, the owner of the land on the Virginia side of the river. (WTOP/Neal Augenstein)
(1/4)

When White’s Ferry last transported vehicles and people across the Potomac River between Loudoun County, Virginia, and Montgomery County, Maryland, it carried between 600 and 800 vehicles daily — and a new study considers what it would take to increase usage.

In December 2020, the ferry’s owner stopped operations after a decision by a Loudoun County Circuit Court regarding the ferry’s right to use land on the Virginia side of the river. A new study investigates short and long-term possibilities for White’s Ferry, and will be presented to Loudoun County’s Board of Supervisors on Nov. 16.



Two alternatives were studied — restoring the most recent ferry service, or making long-term changes in infrastructure to increase capacity and usage of the last working ferry crossing the Potomac.

Restarting the ferry service would, at a minimum, “require inspecting the existing vessel to confirm its seaworthiness, ensuring adequate staffing and restringing the ferry cable,” which guides the diesel-powered ferry between landings near Poolesville, Maryland, and north of Leesburg, Virginia.

If the decision were made to enhance White’s Ferry: “Long-term changes in infrastructure, including improvements in staffing, roadways, fare collection, lighting, vessel upgrades and vessel capacity should be considered to improve the system’s capacity and resiliency.”

When it last ran, it took approximately six minutes to load the ferry, three-and-a-half minutes to cross the Potomac and six minutes to unload on the other side.

Since White’s Ferry has run on-demand — when the ferry operator decides there are enough vehicles to warrant a trip across the river — it would be difficult to have more than four round trips per hour.

Increasing capacity would likely include constructing and reconfiguring roads to allow more, and potentially larger, vehicles to get on and off the ferry.

On the Virginia side, a hairpin turn leading to the ferry landing limits the number and size of vehicles that can access it. The study includes sketches of suggested improvements that would replace the hairpin turn with a more direct road to the landing.

Figure 4-9, showing the study’s suggested long-term improvements to Virginia. (Courtesy White’s Ferry Operations Alternative Study)

Another way to speed things up could involve electronic payments before boarding the ferry.

The ferry is actually two smaller ferries, bound together and operating as one. The study said one of the historic ferries will likely need to be replaced by 2028 — the other, soon after that. Among the alternatives: replacing the original ferries with similar-sized ones, or purchasing a larger, single ferry, either hybrid-powered or run on electricity.

The study finds usage of the ferry is at its highest on weekends — Saturdays in particular. The thought is, the weekend usage is related to what is on either side of the Potomac: A boat launch, White’s Ferry Store and Grill, National Park Service, parking on the Maryland side and nearby wineries on the Virginia side of the Potomac.

Making ferry usage more predictable for drivers could include electronic signage on Route 15 in Loudoun County, and larger roads in Montgomery County, advising of operating conditions.

Landings on either side of the Potomac are in the 100-year floodplain. Flooding in 2018 brought water levels 28 feet above normal levels, according to the study.

The study does not offer suggestions on how to move forward, but provides projected economic impacts, including travel time savings, travel cost savings, safety savings and the value of emissions avoided.

Restoring current ferry service would likely result in travel time savings between $1 million and $1.7 million annually. With the enhanced ferry service, travel time savings could reach $3.5 million annually.

In a statement, Chuck Kuhn, owner of White’s Ferry, said they “appreciate the work and insights from the recent joint study by Montgomery and Loudoun Counties.”

“It underscores White’s Ferry importance to the region and also revealed the difficulties in maintaining and making the ferry a private successful enterprise as the previous owners recognized. We remain committed to making White’s Ferry operational and affordable for customers. The ferry is a scenic crossing but also an important connection that helps employees get to work and contributes to the economy in many other ways. The impasse has cost people time and money and added traffic and environmental woes to our community. We look to the counties to help us move forward and support whatever direction they deem best to get White’s Ferry working for our region.”

Neal Augenstein

Neal Augenstein has been a general assignment reporter with WTOP since 1997. He says he looks forward to coming to work every day, even though that means waking up at 3:30 a.m.

Federal News Network Logo
Log in to your WTOP account for notifications and alerts customized for you.

Sign up