This article is about 7 years old

An early review of Super Bowl commercials you’ll be talking about Monday

WASHINGTON — We’re plumbing new depths of late-stage capitalism these days.

Brands have become so self-consumed with their own ad campaigns that Jennifer Garner is sharing the story of her Capital One endorsement on screen with her father, while Nationwide has convinced itself that people want to see faux studio sessions of Peyton Manning and Brad Paisley working on ad jingles.

So it should come as no surprise that 30-second Super Bowl ads — which cost more than $1 million on average to make and another $5 million to air, a total of about 35 percent more than the entire production budget for the feature film “Get Out” — now have trailers and teasers of their own.

But we’re not going to stoop so low as to review teasers to ads. Those companies that only released commercials for their commercials — Skittles, Amazon, Tide, etc. — have made us wait, so they too will have to wait for their reviews.

Here, we’re only looking at the spots that are actually available — and that we could find in an afternoon of research — and grading them on their effectiveness through a composite score of memorability, humor and cachet around the water cooler the next day.

Flip through the slides below as we go from worst-to-first in our own grading of this year’s Super Bowl ads.

Squarespace Relying on minimalism and a single, recognizable lead actor (as they did with Jeff Bridges in the past), Squarespace is hoping to follow the same formula here. But Bridges is the dude, and Keanu Reeves just a dude. It gets the message across, but doesn’t leave much of a mark. Memorability: 1/5 Humor: 2/5 Water Cooler Cachet: 5/10 Overall Score: 8/20
(1/12)

Federal News Network Logo
Log in to your WTOP account for notifications and alerts customized for you.

Sign up