READ: Amy Coney Barrett’s opening statement to Senate Judiciary Committee

Senate Judiciary Committee hearings for Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett are set to begin Monday.

Read a copy of her opening statement, as prepared for delivery, released Sunday in advance of the hearing:

Opening Statement at Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing

Monday, October 12, 2020

Chairman Graham, Ranking Member Feinstein, and Members of the

Committee: I am honored and humbled to appear before you as a nominee for

Associate Justice of the Supreme Court.

I thank the President for entrusting me with this profound responsibility, as

well as for the graciousness that he and the First Lady have shown my family

throughout this process.

I thank Senator Young for introducing me, as he did at my hearing to serve on

the Seventh Circuit. I thank Senator Braun for his generous support. And I am

especially grateful to former Dean Patty O’Hara of Notre Dame Law School. She

hired me as a professor nearly 20 years ago and has been a mentor, colleague, and

friend ever since.

I thank the Members of this Committee—and your other colleagues in the

Senate—who have taken the time to meet with me since my nomination. It has been

a privilege to meet you.

As I said when I was nominated to serve as a Justice, I am used to being in a

group of nine—my family. Nothing is more important to me, and I am so proud to

have them behind me.

My husband Jesse and I have been married for 21 years. He has been a selfless

and wonderful partner at every step along the way. I once asked my sister, “Why do

people say marriage is hard? I think it’s easy.” She said, “Maybe you should ask

Jesse if he agrees.” I decided not to take her advice. I know that I am far luckier in

love than I deserve.

Jesse and I are parents to seven wonderful children. Emma is a sophomore in

college who just might follow her parents into a career in the law. Vivian came to

us from Haiti. When she arrived, she was so weak that we were told she might never

walk or talk normally. She now deadlifts as much as the male athletes at our gym,

and I assure you that she has no trouble talking. Tess is 16, and while she shares her

parents’ love for the liberal arts, she also has a math gene that seems to have skipped

her parents’ generation. John Peter joined us shortly after the devastating earthquake

in Haiti, and Jesse, who brought him home, still describes the shock on JP’s face

when he got off the plane in wintertime Chicago. Once that shock wore off, JP

assumed the happy-go-lucky attitude that is still his signature trait. Liam is smart,

strong, and kind, and to our delight, he still loves watching movies with Mom and

Dad. Ten-year-old Juliet is already pursuing her goal of becoming an author by

writing multiple essays and short stories, including one she recently submitted for

publication. And our youngest—Benjamin, who has Down Syndrome—is the

unanimous favorite of the family.

My own siblings are here, some in the hearing room and some nearby. Carrie,

Megan, Eileen, Amanda, Vivian, and Michael are my oldest and dearest friends.

We’ve seen each other through both the happy and hard parts of life, and I am so

grateful that they are with me now.

My parents, Mike and Linda Coney, are watching from their New Orleans

home. My father was a lawyer and my mother was a teacher, which explains how I

ended up as a law professor. More important, my parents modeled for me and my

six siblings a life of service, principle, faith, and love. I remember preparing for a

grade-school spelling bee against a boy in my class. To boost my confidence, Dad

sang, “Anything boys can do, girls can do better.” At least as I remember it, I spelled

my way to victory.

I received similar encouragement from the devoted teachers at St. Mary’s

Dominican, my all-girls high school in New Orleans. When I went to college, it

never occurred to me that anyone would consider girls to be less capable than boys.

My freshman year, I took a literature class filled with upperclassmen English majors.

When I did my first presentation—on Breakfast at Tiffany’s—I feared I had failed.

But my professor filled me with confidence, became a mentor, and—when I

graduated with a degree in English—gave me Truman Capote’s collected works.

Although I considered graduate studies in English, I decided my passion for

words was better suited to deciphering statutes than novels. I was fortunate to have

wonderful legal mentors—in particular, the judges for whom I clerked. The

legendary Judge Laurence Silberman of the D.C. Circuit gave me my first job in the

law and continues to teach me today. He was by my side during my Seventh Circuit

hearing and investiture, and he is cheering me on from his living room now.

I also clerked for Justice Scalia, and like many law students, I felt like I knew

the justice before I ever met him, because I had read so many of his colorful,

accessible opinions. More than the style of his writing, though, it was the content of

Justice Scalia’s reasoning that shaped me. His judicial philosophy was

straightforward: A judge must apply the law as written, not as the judge wishes it

were. Sometimes that approach meant reaching results that he did not like. But as

he put it in one of his best known opinions, that is what it means to say we have a

government of laws, not of men.

Justice Scalia taught me more than just law. He was devoted to his family,

resolute in his beliefs, and fearless of criticism. And as I embarked on my own legal

career, I resolved to maintain that same perspective. There is a tendency in our

profession to treat the practice of law as all-consuming, while losing sight of

everything else. But that makes for a shallow and unfulfilling life. I worked hard

as a lawyer and a professor; I owed that to my clients, my students, and myself. But

I never let the law define my identity or crowd out the rest of my life.

A similar principle applies to the role of courts. Courts have a vital

responsibility to enforce the rule of law, which is critical to a free society. But courts

are not designed to solve every problem or right every wrong in our public life. The

policy decisions and value judgments of government must be made by the political

branches elected by and accountable to the People. The public should not expect

courts to do so, and courts should not try.

That is the approach I have strived to follow as a judge on the Seventh Circuit.

In every case, I have carefully considered the arguments presented by the parties,

discussed the issues with my colleagues on the court, and done my utmost to reach

the result required by the law, whatever my own preferences might be. I try to

remain mindful that, while my court decides thousands of cases a year, each case is

the most important one to the parties involved. After all, cases are not like statutes,

which are often named for their authors. Cases are named for the parties who stand

to gain or lose in the real world, often through their liberty or livelihood.

When I write an opinion resolving a case, I read every word from the

perspective of the losing party. I ask myself how would I view the decision if one

of my children was the party I was ruling against: Even though I would not like the

result, would I understand that the decision was fairly reasoned and grounded in the

law? That is the standard I set for myself in every case, and it is the standard I will

follow as long as I am a judge on any court.

When the President offered this nomination, I was deeply honored. But it was

not a position I had sought out, and I thought carefully before accepting. The

confirmation process—and the work of serving on the Court if I am confirmed—

requires sacrifices, particularly from my family. I chose to accept the nomination

because I believe deeply in the rule of law and the place of the Supreme Court in our

Nation. I believe Americans of all backgrounds deserve an independent Supreme

Court that interprets our Constitution and laws as they are written. And I believe I

can serve my country by playing that role.

I come before this Committee with humility about the responsibility I have

been asked to undertake, and with appreciation for those who came before me. I

was nine years old when Sandra Day O’Connor became the first woman to sit in this

seat. She was a model of grace and dignity throughout her distinguished tenure on

the Court. When I was 21 years old and just beginning my career, Ruth Bader

Ginsburg sat in this seat. She told the Committee, “What has become of me could

only happen in America.” I have been nominated to fill Justice Ginsburg’s seat, but

no one will ever take her place. I will be forever grateful for the path she marked

and the life she led.

If confirmed, it would be the honor of a lifetime to serve alongside the Chief

Justice and seven Associate Justices. I admire them all and would consider each a

valued colleague. And I might bring a few new perspectives to the bench. As the

President noted when he announced my nomination, I would be the first mother of

school-age children to serve on the Court. I would be the first Justice to join the

Court from the Seventh Circuit in 45 years. And I would be the only sitting Justice

who didn’t attend law school at Harvard or Yale. I am confident that Notre Dame

will hold its own, and maybe I could even teach them a thing or two about football.

As a final note, Mr. Chairman, I would like to thank the many Americans from

all walks of life who have reached out with messages of support over the course of

my nomination. I believe in the power of prayer, and it has been uplifting to hear

that so many people are praying for me. I look forward to answering the

Committee’s questions over the coming days. And if I am fortunate enough to be

confirmed, I pledge to faithfully and impartially discharge my duties to the American

people as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court. Thank you.

Related Categories:

US Politics News

Like WTOP on Facebook and follow @WTOP on Twitter to engage in conversation about this article and others.

Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

© 2020 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

More from WTOP

Log in to your WTOP account for notifications and alerts customized for you.

Sign up