Related Story
Local News
Most Viewed
Hot Topics
In the suit filed in federal court, Roy Pearson claims he was wrongfully dismissed for exposing corruption within the Office of Administrative Hearings, the department where he worked. In court documents, Pearson said he was protected as a whistle-blower and that the city used the fact that he was being "vilified in the media" to cut him out of his job.
In a response to a Freedom of Information Act request from The Associated Press, the city's general counsel wrote that Pearson's term as an administrative law judge expired in May 2007, and the D.C. Commission on Selection and Tenure of Administrative Law Judges voted not to reappoint him.
The panel reached its decision based on Pearson's work and temperament as a judge and the $54 million lawsuit. Pearson had requested to be appointed for a 10-year term.
The $54 million pants suit saga began when Pearson filed a civil suit against Jin Nam and Ki Chung, the owners of Custom Cleaners in Northeast, for losing a pair of pants and using signs that Pearson claimed were deceptive.
In June 2007, Judge Judith Bartnoff ruled that the Chungs did not violate the consumer protection law by failing to live up to Pearson's expectations of the "Satisfaction Guaranteed" sign once displayed in the store.
The Chungs sold the business because of the revenue losses and emotional toll the family suffered as a result of the lawsuit.
Initially, Pearson calculated his losses at $67 million but lowered his request to $54 million.
(Copyright 2008 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)
In the suit filed in federal court, Roy Pearson claims he was wrongfully dismissed for exposing corruption within the Office of Administrative Hearings, the department where he worked. In court documents, Pearson said he was protected as a whistle-blower and that the city used the fact that he was being "vilified in the media" to cut him out of his job.
In a response to a Freedom of Information Act request from The Associated Press, the city's general counsel wrote that Pearson's term as an administrative law judge expired in May 2007, and the D.C. Commission on Selection and Tenure of Administrative Law Judges voted not to reappoint him.
The panel reached its decision based on Pearson's work and temperament as a judge and the $54 million lawsuit. Pearson had requested to be appointed for a 10-year term.
The $54 million pants suit saga began when Pearson filed a civil suit against Jin Nam and Ki Chung, the owners of Custom Cleaners in Northeast, for losing a pair of pants and using signs that Pearson claimed were deceptive.
In June 2007, Judge Judith Bartnoff ruled that the Chungs did not violate the consumer protection law by failing to live up to Pearson's expectations of the "Satisfaction Guaranteed" sign once displayed in the store.
The Chungs sold the business because of the revenue losses and emotional toll the family suffered as a result of the lawsuit.
Initially, Pearson calculated his losses at $67 million but lowered his request to $54 million.
(Copyright 2008 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)
-
Mike Causey's Federal Report
On Federal News Radio, AM 1500 -
mobile.WTOPNEWS
Get Text Messages and wtopnews.com on Your PDA -
Contact Us
Send us a comment or a news tip -
Emergency Preparation
Is your family prepared?
| EEO Public File Report | Bonneville International
RSS Feeds
Podcasts AP material Copyright 2010 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
![[Federal News Radio]](/images/layout/header2/sister_wfed.gif)
![[Costum Commute]](/images/custom.gif)
![[Listen to WTOP]](/images/layout/buttons/listen_button3.gif)
![[WTOP Audio Center]](/images/layout/buttons/audio_button3.gif)
![[Home]](/images/layout/header2/logo.gif)






